erfasoft.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. This relatively new domain was registered less than three years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #7,334,625
▼ 1,022,100
- Rank in TLD
- #3,110,145
▼ 464,467
- Referring Domains
- 37
▼ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.7
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 0 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.0
- Referring Domains
- 37
- Linked Domains
- 105
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 32
20–29 5
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 37
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| hawaiiwarriorworld.com | 25.3 | #4,572,414 |
| qd-arfa.com | 21.4 | #7,837,910 |
| jsoly.com | 21.0 | #8,328,524 |
| mikdoe.com | 20.5 | #9,005,928 |
| opticalostilos.net | 20.3 | #9,340,027 |
| mykamas.com | 19.9 | #9,910,240 |
| kknowk.com | 19.9 | #9,964,909 |
| hnlzjj.com | 19.6 | #10,399,339 |
| yxgmdjd.com | 19.3 | #10,877,394 |
| 360ziyuan.com | 18.9 | #11,620,910 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 8 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 8 Feb 2027 (95 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Gname 147 Inc
Subdomain
m.erfasoft.comwww.erfasoft.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | erfasoft.com | 600 | 154.215.76.34 |
| NS | erfasoft.com | 86400 | ns1.dns.com |
| NS | erfasoft.com | 86400 | ns2.dns.com |
| SOA | erfasoft.com | 600 | ns1.dns.com. admin.dns.com. 1791046360 3600 300 1209600 1800 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.