ercim.eu
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #21,511
▼ 1,269
- Rank in TLD
- #88
▼ 3
- Referring Domains
- 748
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 41.2
- Subdomains
- 29
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 41.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 40.3
- Referring Domains
- 748
- Linked Domains
- 1,954
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 30
10–19 102
20–29 121
30–39 117
40–49 102
50–59 114
60–69 116
70–79 27
80–89 13
90–100 6
Total 748
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wordpress.org | 93.7 | #18 |
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| microsoft.com | 91.9 | #33 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| mozilla.org | 89.8 | #52 |
| w3.org | 88.8 | #62 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| acm.org | 85.6 | #137 |
Basic Information
- Registry
- EURid vzw
- Registrar
- GANDI
Subdomain
acgt.ercim.eubscw.ercim.eucoregrid.ercim.eudigitalworld.ercim.eudiligent.ercim.euechogrid.ercim.euercim-news.ercim.euercimnews.ercim.eufellowship.ercim.eufet11.ercim.eugridatasia.ercim.eugridcomp.ercim.eulists.ercim.eumobiwebapp.ercim.eumuscle.ercim.eunet-wms.ercim.eupaasage.ercim.eupalette.ercim.euparis2009.ercim.euprimelife.ercim.eu
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ercim.eu | 10800 | 193.51.208.69 |
| MX | ercim.eu | 10800 | 10 richard.ercim.eu |
| MX | ercim.eu | 10800 | 50 pan.w3.org |
| NS | ercim.eu | 10800 | ns-135-c.gandi.net |
| NS | ercim.eu | 10800 | ns-31-a.gandi.net |
| NS | ercim.eu | 10800 | ns-149-b.gandi.net |
| SOA | ercim.eu | 10800 | ns1.gandi.net. hostmaster.gandi.net. 1793836800 10800 3600 604800 10800 |
| TXT | ercim.eu | 300 | v=spf1 mx mx:w3.org ip4:193.51.208.64/27 include:_spf.google.com ~all |
| TXT | ercim.eu | 300 | google-site-verification=n8kHpw4xsAwHcAStHGA3V-QJfmuK37Z4viymx2JQyC4 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.