epde.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #818,721
▲ 50,040
- Rank in TLD
- #88,926
▲ 3,500
- Referring Domains
- 201
▲ 20
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.6
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 13 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 35.4
- Referring Domains
- 201
- Linked Domains
- 448
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 9
10–19 32
20–29 38
30–39 38
40–49 35
50–59 24
60–69 20
70–79 2
80–89 2
90–100 1
Total 201
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| frontiersin.org | 80.3 | #465 |
| lse.ac.uk | 74.6 | #1,376 |
| thedailybeast.com | 70.9 | #2,887 |
| bpb.de | 69.7 | #3,531 |
| univie.ac.at | 69.7 | #3,556 |
| carnegieendowment.org | 68.9 | #4,101 |
| freedomhouse.org | 68.3 | #4,502 |
| themoscowtimes.com | 66.3 | #6,151 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 17 Dec 2012
- Last updated
- 21 Jan 2026
- Expires
- 17 Dec 2026 (42 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- RegistryGate GmbH
Subdomain
db.epde.orgimc.epde.orgnewsletter.epde.orgwww.epde.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | epde.org | 7200 | 85.13.143.85 |
| MX | epde.org | 7200 | 10 w01ef426.kasserver.com |
| NS | epde.org | 7200 | ns6.kasserver.com |
| NS | epde.org | 7200 | ns5.kasserver.com |
| SOA | epde.org | 7200 | ns5.kasserver.com. hostmaster.kasserver.com. 2610140119 28800 7200 1209600 7200 |
| TXT | epde.org | 7200 | v=spf1 mx a include:spf.nl2go.com -all |
| TXT | epde.org | 7200 | brevo-code:758f3ddf992376d2cac7e23588dc1c50 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.