enlight.ru
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,382,624
▼ 182,504
- Rank in TLD
- #25,990
▼ 3,560
- Referring Domains
- 578
▼ 29
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 20.9
- Subdomains
- 5
- Domain age
- 29 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 20.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 16.8
- Referring Domains
- 578
- Linked Domains
- 1,749
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 60
10–19 317
20–29 99
30–39 40
40–49 31
50–59 15
60–69 7
70–79 7
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 578
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| cmu.edu | 79.4 | #555 |
| usc.edu | 76.6 | #937 |
| livejournal.com | 75.9 | #1,065 |
| telegra.ph | 72.9 | #1,958 |
| narod.ru | 71.8 | #2,456 |
| hubpages.com | 70.6 | #2,998 |
| habr.com | 70.0 | #3,363 |
| ya.ru | 69.5 | #3,725 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ruRussia
- Registration date
- 19 Feb 1997
- Expires
- 28 Feb 2027 (116 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- REGISTERED DELEGATED UNVERIFIED
- Registry
- Coordination Center for TLD RU
- Registrar
- BEGET-RU
Subdomain
cc.enlight.rufrog.enlight.ruwww.frog.enlight.ruftp.enlight.ruwww.enlight.ru
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | enlight.ru | 86400 | 93.88.128.244 |
| MX | enlight.ru | 86400 | 5 ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM |
| MX | enlight.ru | 86400 | 1 ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM |
| MX | enlight.ru | 86400 | 10 ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM |
| MX | enlight.ru | 86400 | 10 ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM |
| MX | enlight.ru | 86400 | 5 ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM |
| NS | enlight.ru | 86400 | ns1.riddle.ru |
| NS | enlight.ru | 86400 | ns2.afraid.org |
| SOA | enlight.ru | 86400 | ns1.riddle.ru. noc.riddle.ru. 2023080605 28800 7200 864000 86400 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.