elfsternberg.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #680,310
▲ 771,343
- Rank in TLD
- #279,074
▲ 329,617
- Referring Domains
- 29
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 45.4
- Subdomains
- 5
- Domain age
- 18 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 45.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 44.3
- Referring Domains
- 29
- Linked Domains
- 206
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 1
20–29 6
30–39 6
40–49 3
50–59 5
60–69 4
70–79 0
80–89 2
90–100 1
Total 29
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| mozilla.org | 89.8 | #52 |
| meyerweb.com | 80.2 | #472 |
| teamtreehouse.com | 61.6 | #13,099 |
| redmonk.com | 61.4 | #13,481 |
| davidwalsh.name | 61.3 | #13,936 |
| scienceblogs.com | 60.9 | #14,894 |
| sdf.org | 57.9 | #25,777 |
| thegeekstuff.com | 56.9 | #30,345 |
| nedbatchelder.com | 55.6 | #37,644 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 29 Apr 2008
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2026
- Expires
- 29 Apr 2027 (175 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GoDaddy.com, LLC
Subdomain
git.elfsternberg.comhtml5magnets.elfsternberg.compriorities.elfsternberg.comrightnow.elfsternberg.comwww.elfsternberg.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | elfsternberg.com | 3600 | 45.79.87.27 |
| MX | elfsternberg.com | 3600 | 0 pendorwright.com |
| NS | elfsternberg.com | 3600 | ns13.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | elfsternberg.com | 3600 | ns14.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | elfsternberg.com | 3600 | ns13.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2026022200 28800 7200 604800 3600 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.