efunda.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #70,392
▼ 722
- Rank in TLD
- #31,183
▼ 546
- Referring Domains
- 4,234
▼ 114
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.6
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 27 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 16.2
- Referring Domains
- 4,234
- Linked Domains
- 2,377
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 881
10–19 1,766
20–29 632
30–39 245
40–49 402
50–59 219
60–69 46
70–79 29
80–89 10
90–100 4
Total 4,234
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| squarespace.com | 90.3 | #46 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| acm.org | 85.6 | #137 |
| linktr.ee | 84.7 | #161 |
| jotform.com | 84.5 | #170 |
| mit.edu | 83.2 | #238 |
| hatena.ne.jp | 82.7 | #270 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 24 Nov 1998
- Last updated
- 24 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 23 Nov 2031 (1,844 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
www.efunda.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | efunda.com | 7200 | 52.26.242.54 |
| MX | efunda.com | 7200 | 20 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | efunda.com | 7200 | 40 aspmx2.googlemail.com |
| MX | efunda.com | 7200 | 30 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | efunda.com | 7200 | 10 aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | efunda.com | 7200 | 50 aspmx3.googlemail.com |
| NS | efunda.com | 7200 | ns62.worldnic.com |
| NS | efunda.com | 7200 | ns61.worldnic.com |
| SOA | efunda.com | 7200 | NS61.WORLDNIC.com. namehost.WORLDNIC.com. 123030602 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | efunda.com | 7200 | v=spf1 a mx ip4:128.242.106.217/29 ip4:173.164.201.18 include:aspmx.googlemail.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.