efpt.eu
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #2,407,206
▼ 135,243
- Rank in TLD
- #19,444
▼ 1,654
- Referring Domains
- 42
▲ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 31.9
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 31.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 31.0
- Referring Domains
- 42
- Linked Domains
- 153
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 4
10–19 9
20–29 6
30–39 8
40–49 10
50–59 4
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 42
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| uantwerpen.be | 62.4 | #11,474 |
| u-paris.fr | 58.8 | #21,879 |
| univ-tours.fr | 57.1 | #29,403 |
| urosario.edu.co | 57.1 | #29,665 |
| aeksh.de | 54.0 | #49,232 |
| ecnp.eu | 49.1 | #111,715 |
| ifmsa.org | 48.5 | #125,540 |
| slf.se | 48.4 | #126,212 |
| psychiatr.ru | 45.7 | #200,549 |
| cress-umr1153.fr | 45.4 | #208,052 |
Basic Information
- Registry
- EURid vzw
- Registrar
- Tucows.com Co.
Subdomain
www.efpt.eu
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | efpt.eu | 30 | 34.120.190.48 |
| A | efpt.eu | 30 | 35.244.153.44 |
| A | efpt.eu | 30 | 34.160.81.203 |
| A | efpt.eu | 30 | 34.149.120.3 |
| MX | efpt.eu | 86400 | 20 mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com |
| MX | efpt.eu | 86400 | 30 mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com |
| MX | efpt.eu | 86400 | 10 mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com |
| NS | efpt.eu | 86400 | ns1.siteground.net |
| NS | efpt.eu | 86400 | ns2.siteground.net |
| SOA | efpt.eu | 14400 | ns1.siteground.net. admins.siteground.com. 129 86400 7200 3600000 86400 |
| TXT | efpt.eu | 14400 | v=spf1 +a +mx include:efpt.eu.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.