efdeportes.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #93,167
▲ 23,965
- Rank in TLD
- #40,865
▲ 9,086
- Referring Domains
- 1,198
▼ 41
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.8
- Subdomains
- 5
- Domain age
- 26 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.8
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 22.1
- Referring Domains
- 1,198
- Linked Domains
- 1,851
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 188
10–19 335
20–29 236
30–39 162
40–49 117
50–59 103
60–69 45
70–79 5
80–89 5
90–100 2
Total 1,198
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| doi.org | 86.2 | #117 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| frontiersin.org | 80.3 | #465 |
| uol.com.br | 77.2 | #817 |
| usp.br | 71.7 | #2,477 |
| wikibooks.org | 70.9 | #2,888 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 17 Jun 2000
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2022
- Expires
- 17 Jun 2027 (224 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
m.efdeportes.comtest.efdeportes.comwww.test.efdeportes.comwww.webmail.efdeportes.comwww.efdeportes.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | efdeportes.com | 3600 | 178.32.156.216 |
| MX | efdeportes.com | 3600 | 0 mail.efdeportes.com |
| NS | efdeportes.com | 3600 | ns1.centos-webpanel.com |
| NS | efdeportes.com | 3600 | ns2.centos-webpanel.com |
| SOA | efdeportes.com | 86400 | ns1.centos-webpanel.com. postmaster.efdeportes.com. 2026060370 3600 3600 1209600 3600 |
| TXT | efdeportes.com | 14400 | v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:178.32.156.216 -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.