eecc.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,349,627
▲ 242,186
- Rank in TLD
- #61,314
▲ 11,268
- Referring Domains
- 26
▲ 7
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.4
- Subdomains
- 10
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 29.5
- Referring Domains
- 26
- Linked Domains
- 1,989
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 3
20–29 7
30–39 4
40–49 3
50–59 0
60–69 5
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 26
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| w3.org | 88.8 | #62 |
| lazada.co.th | 66.3 | #6,132 |
| lazada.com.ph | 66.1 | #6,338 |
| lazada.vn | 65.8 | #6,627 |
| lazada.co.id | 65.1 | #7,338 |
| lazada.sg | 63.5 | #9,467 |
| gs1.fr | 48.5 | #125,164 |
| spherity.com | 45.7 | #200,345 |
| gs1.de | 43.4 | #285,597 |
| octagonai.co | 38.9 | #563,422 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2017
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
dpp.eecc.deeu-dpp.eecc.deid.eecc.dematrix.eecc.dessi-wallet.prod-k8s.eecc.derailpoc.eecc.dessi.eecc.decouponing-demo.ssi.eecc.deipfs.ssi.eecc.dewarranty-demo.ssi.eecc.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | eecc.de | 3600 | 217.160.0.244 |
| AAAA | eecc.de | 3600 | 2001:8d8:100f:f000::27d |
| MX | eecc.de | 3600 | 0 eecc-de.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | eecc.de | 3600 | ns1106.ui-dns.com |
| NS | eecc.de | 3600 | ns1040.ui-dns.biz |
| NS | eecc.de | 3600 | ns1019.ui-dns.org |
| NS | eecc.de | 3600 | ns1101.ui-dns.de |
| SOA | eecc.de | 86400 | ns1019.ui-dns.org. hostmaster.1and1.com. 2017102718 28800 7200 604800 300 |
| TXT | eecc.de | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
| TXT | eecc.de | 3600 | CENTRAL-9923 |
| TXT | eecc.de | 3600 | guckdaax7q |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.