ecomodder.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #962,722
▼ 91,226
- Rank in TLD
- #396,058
▼ 39,132
- Referring Domains
- 244
▲ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.9
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 18 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 24.1
- Referring Domains
- 244
- Linked Domains
- 1,136
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 34
10–19 56
20–29 65
30–39 34
40–49 20
50–59 18
60–69 10
70–79 4
80–89 2
90–100 1
Total 244
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| canada.ca | 80.9 | #397 |
| oup.com | 80.9 | #401 |
| techradar.com | 76.6 | #936 |
| ucsd.edu | 75.7 | #1,113 |
| arduino.cc | 70.8 | #2,898 |
| qgiv.com | 70.2 | #3,231 |
| ibiblio.org | 69.9 | #3,456 |
| newatlas.com | 65.5 | #6,936 |
| grist.org | 65.2 | #7,267 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 7 Nov 2007
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2025
- Expires
- 7 Nov 2026 (2 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Wild West Domains, LLC
Subdomain
form.ecomodder.comforum.ecomodder.comwww.ecomodder.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ecomodder.com | 600 | 209.87.231.53 |
| MX | ecomodder.com | 3600 | 0 ecomodder-com.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | ecomodder.com | 3600 | ns07.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | ecomodder.com | 3600 | ns08.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | ecomodder.com | 600 | ns07.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2022122900 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | ecomodder.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:secureserver.net -all |
| TXT | ecomodder.com | 3600 | NETORGFT12365039.onmicrosoft.com |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.