dsb.de
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #22,769
▲ 1,296
- Rank in TLD
- #752
▲ 80
- Referring Domains
- 2,428
▼ 48
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 16.7
- Subdomains
- 11
- Domain age
- —
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 16.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 14.9
- Referring Domains
- 2,428
- Linked Domains
- 620
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 499
10–19 1,315
20–29 425
30–39 85
40–49 53
50–59 27
60–69 13
70–79 8
80–89 1
90–100 2
Total 2,428
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| website-start.de | 80.0 | #490 |
| free.fr | 78.2 | #681 |
| change.org | 77.0 | #847 |
| nrw.de | 76.9 | #885 |
| podigee.io | 72.9 | #1,939 |
| over-blog.com | 72.3 | #2,199 |
| tum.de | 71.0 | #2,818 |
| wikibooks.org | 70.9 | #2,888 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2026
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
assets.dsb.debundesliga.dsb.dewww.bundesliga.dsb.dekidsgames.dsb.dems.dsb.denewsletter.dsb.deparis.dsb.dewww.paris.dsb.detokio.dsb.deww.dsb.dewww.dsb.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | dsb.de | 3600 | 23.88.7.68 |
| MX | dsb.de | 3600 | 0 dsb-de.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | dsb.de | 3600 | ns71.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | dsb.de | 3600 | ns72.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | dsb.de | 3600 | ns71.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2025103000 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | dsb.de | 3600 | v=spf1 a mx ip4:80.151.249.156 ip4:87.129.245.52 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:ispgateway.de include:spf.emailsignatures365.com ~all |
| TXT | dsb.de | 3600 | apple-domain-verification=Fv1Jg7G643pToxT8 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.