donestech.net
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #371,687
▲ 19,323
- Rank in TLD
- #12,281
▲ 682
- Referring Domains
- 155
▼ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.7
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 19 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 32.2
- Referring Domains
- 155
- Linked Domains
- 1,028
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 7
10–19 19
20–29 35
30–39 37
40–49 29
50–59 19
60–69 6
70–79 2
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 155
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| debian.org | 79.1 | #584 |
| gencat.cat | 71.3 | #2,639 |
| ub.edu | 67.6 | #5,021 |
| scoop.it | 67.4 | #5,191 |
| ugr.es | 64.6 | #7,933 |
| indymedia.org | 61.8 | #12,596 |
| fsfe.org | 60.1 | #17,130 |
| univ-nantes.fr | 60.0 | #17,489 |
| 3cat.cat | 59.5 | #18,965 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .net
- Registration date
- 12 Dec 2006
- Last updated
- 13 Dec 2022
- Expires
- 12 Dec 2032 (2,229 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Dinahosting s.l.
Subdomain
www.donestech.net
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | donestech.net | 300 | 94.130.153.94 |
| MX | donestech.net | 300 | 10 alia.maadix.org |
| NS | donestech.net | 300 | ns3.dinahosting.com |
| NS | donestech.net | 300 | ns2.dinahosting.com |
| NS | donestech.net | 300 | ns.dinahosting.com |
| NS | donestech.net | 300 | ns4.dinahosting.com |
| SOA | donestech.net | 300 | ns.dinahosting.com. dnsadmin.dinahosting.com. 2020121901 3600 120 1209600 300 |
| TXT | donestech.net | 300 | v=spf1 mx ip4:94.130.153.94 a:alia.maadix.org ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.