doctor-navi.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #485,844
▼ 259,553
- Rank in TLD
- #199,899
▼ 105,242
- Referring Domains
- 764
▼ 32
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.5
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 26 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 17.2
- Referring Domains
- 764
- Linked Domains
- 7,526
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 138
10–19 329
20–29 130
30–39 57
40–49 70
50–59 19
60–69 11
70–79 8
80–89 2
90–100 0
Total 764
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| hatena.ne.jp | 82.7 | #270 |
| bitbucket.org | 77.8 | #732 |
| biglobe.ne.jp | 73.4 | #1,787 |
| livedoor.jp | 72.6 | #2,091 |
| usp.br | 71.7 | #2,477 |
| neocities.org | 71.5 | #2,561 |
| xsrv.jp | 71.0 | #2,829 |
| vanderbilt.edu | 70.9 | #2,845 |
| lolipop.jp | 70.4 | #3,128 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 1 Dec 1999
- Last updated
- 15 Nov 2025
- Expires
- 1 Dec 2026 (26 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com
Subdomain
pet.doctor-navi.comwww.doctor-navi.comzutsu.doctor-navi.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | doctor-navi.com | 3600 | 153.122.196.21 |
| MX | doctor-navi.com | 3600 | 1 mail.doctor-navi.com |
| NS | doctor-navi.com | 86400 | ns2.vps-gmocloud.com |
| NS | doctor-navi.com | 86400 | ns1.vps-gmocloud.com |
| SOA | doctor-navi.com | 3600 | ns1.vps-gmocloud.com. root.vps-gmocloud.com. 2740282912 10800 1800 259200 1800 |
| TXT | doctor-navi.com | 3600 | google-site-verification=5lYY17G2PB1iDqC5AI1Plgwfj_S-8s3yk6xxg2Upm54 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.