dimb.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #146,737
▲ 4,408
- Rank in TLD
- #6,141
▲ 471
- Referring Domains
- 406
▼ 10
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.3
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 20.0
- Referring Domains
- 406
- Linked Domains
- 466
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 44
10–19 158
20–29 100
30–39 54
40–49 27
50–59 13
60–69 6
70–79 3
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 406
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| zeit.de | 73.9 | #1,570 |
| hessen.de | 73.6 | #1,707 |
| bundestag.de | 73.6 | #1,683 |
| outdooractive.com | 66.2 | #6,263 |
| eveeno.com | 65.5 | #6,928 |
| openpetition.de | 64.5 | #8,115 |
| ksta.de | 63.1 | #10,063 |
| adfc.de | 62.4 | #11,442 |
| wikivoyage.org | 60.6 | #15,751 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2026
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
alt.dimb.deshop.dimb.dewww.dimb.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | dimb.de | 7200 | 85.13.133.140 |
| MX | dimb.de | 7200 | 0 dimb-de.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | dimb.de | 7200 | ns5.kasserver.com |
| NS | dimb.de | 7200 | ns6.kasserver.com |
| SOA | dimb.de | 7200 | ns5.kasserver.com. hostmaster.kasserver.com. 2610240246 28800 7200 1209600 7200 |
| TXT | dimb.de | 7200 | MS=ms12057600 |
| TXT | dimb.de | 7200 | v=spf1 include:spf.mailing-server.org ip4:85.13.133.140/32 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.crsend.com -all |
| TXT | dimb.de | 7200 | google-site-verification=0Ls1Ei-YtdmGZcidWPjLwQrVigtjuI1q3Q4cjnuEhv0 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.