dfjv.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #176,562
▼ 8,877
- Rank in TLD
- #7,431
▼ 58
- Referring Domains
- 353
▼ 17
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.3
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 24.3
- Referring Domains
- 353
- Linked Domains
- 1,446
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 36
10–19 94
20–29 95
30–39 46
40–49 39
50–59 22
60–69 16
70–79 2
80–89 2
90–100 1
Total 353
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| bit.ly | 88.4 | #67 |
| statista.com | 83.5 | #225 |
| podigee.io | 72.9 | #1,939 |
| fu-berlin.de | 71.1 | #2,764 |
| bpb.de | 69.7 | #3,531 |
| taz.de | 69.1 | #3,993 |
| wbs.legal | 68.5 | #4,416 |
| tu-dresden.de | 68.3 | #4,563 |
| presseportal.de | 67.7 | #4,992 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 10 Oct 2026
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
antrag.dfjv.demein.dfjv.dewww.dfjv.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | dfjv.de | 300 | 172.67.151.170 |
| A | dfjv.de | 300 | 104.21.40.128 |
| AAAA | dfjv.de | 300 | 2606:4700:3030::ac43:97aa |
| AAAA | dfjv.de | 300 | 2606:4700:3034::6815:2880 |
| MX | dfjv.de | 300 | 5 smtpin.rzone.de |
| NS | dfjv.de | 86400 | edna.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | dfjv.de | 86400 | marek.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | dfjv.de | 1800 | edna.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2418694983 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | dfjv.de | 300 | MS=ms55224500 |
| TXT | dfjv.de | 300 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.strato.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.