degam.de
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #92,192
▲ 2,885
- Rank in TLD
- #3,642
▲ 271
- Referring Domains
- 717
▲ 16
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.7
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.2
- Referring Domains
- 717
- Linked Domains
- 435
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 128
10–19 204
20–29 143
30–39 75
40–49 87
50–59 45
60–69 21
70–79 10
80–89 3
90–100 1
Total 717
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| bund.de | 85.4 | #144 |
| frontiersin.org | 80.3 | #465 |
| plos.org | 78.8 | #607 |
| sueddeutsche.de | 74.5 | #1,411 |
| mpg.de | 74.3 | #1,459 |
| zeit.de | 73.9 | #1,570 |
| bundestag.de | 73.6 | #1,683 |
| over-blog.com | 72.3 | #2,199 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 4 Dec 2012
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
leitlinien.degam.dewww.degam.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | degam.de | 300 | 185.166.20.206 |
| MX | degam.de | 3600 | 100 degam-de.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | degam.de | 3600 | ns1.systemgemisch.de |
| NS | degam.de | 3600 | ns2.systemgemisch.de |
| NS | degam.de | 3600 | ns3.systemgemisch.de |
| SOA | degam.de | 3600 | ns1.systemgemisch.de. hostmaster.degam.de. 2026021901 86400 7200 3600000 172800 |
| TXT | degam.de | 3600 | google-site-verification=74xODtqr_YXT_z4x-rxtNGGfSenWkmPUDtc2tQrBCdE |
| TXT | degam.de | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.strato.com include:spf.crsend.com ip4:91.199.8.0/24 a mx ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.