danieru.com
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #2,624,611
▲ 465,402
- Rank in TLD
- #1,107,563
▲ 172,769
- Referring Domains
- 8
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 49.9
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 16 yr 7 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 49.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 38.3
- Referring Domains
- 8
- Linked Domains
- 79
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 0
20–29 1
30–39 3
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 1
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 8
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| wireshark.org | 70.4 | #3,153 |
| opengameart.org | 60.2 | #16,827 |
| revspace.nl | 40.7 | #434,057 |
| cliqist.com | 35.9 | #857,452 |
| binaergewitter.de | 35.2 | #956,731 |
| chooseplugin.com | 33.3 | #1,337,764 |
| aryan.app | 29.9 | #2,269,595 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 27 Mar 2010
- Last updated
- 19 Feb 2026
- Expires
- 27 Mar 2027 (142 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Porkbun LLC
Subdomain
version.danieru.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | danieru.com | 60 | 69.163.140.142 |
| MX | danieru.com | 60 | 0 mx2.mailchannels.net |
| MX | danieru.com | 60 | 0 mx1.mailchannels.net |
| NS | danieru.com | 14400 | ns1.dreamhost.com |
| NS | danieru.com | 14400 | ns2.dreamhost.com |
| NS | danieru.com | 14400 | ns3.dreamhost.com |
| SOA | danieru.com | 60 | ns1.dreamhost.com. hostmaster.dreamhost.com. 2026100603 17941 600 1814400 60 |
| TXT | danieru.com | 60 | v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.