Skip to content

danielplan.com

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.

Domain Power Rank
33.1
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#1,383,304

▼ 215,209

Rank in TLD
#573,050

▼ 88,574

Referring Domains
140

▲ 14

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
26.9
Subdomains
3
Domain age
15 yr 10 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
tinyurl.com84.1#186
constantcontact.com80.6#429
vice.com77.6#760
yorku.ca69.7#3,566
peta.org64.4#8,245
christianpost.com62.6#11,086
theblaze.com62.4#11,314
bisnow.com62.2#11,877
aleteia.org61.5#13,325
cbn.com61.0#14,489

Basic Information

TLD
.com
Registration date
22 Dec 2010
Last updated
23 Dec 2025
Expires
22 Dec 2026 (47 days remaining)
Registrar
GoDaddy.com, LLC

Subdomain

store.danielplan.comwatch.danielplan.comwww.danielplan.com

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Adanielplan.com300104.26.12.162
Adanielplan.com300104.26.13.162
Adanielplan.com300172.67.75.58
AAAAdanielplan.com3002606:4700:20::ac43:4b3a
AAAAdanielplan.com3002606:4700:20::681a:ca2
AAAAdanielplan.com3002606:4700:20::681a:da2
MXdanielplan.com3000 d313277a.ess.barracudanetworks.com
MXdanielplan.com30010 danielplan-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
MXdanielplan.com3005 d313277b.ess.barracudanetworks.com
NSdanielplan.com86400coby.ns.cloudflare.com
NSdanielplan.com86400jo.ns.cloudflare.com
SOAdanielplan.com1800coby.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2416198429 10000 2400 604800 1800
TXTdanielplan.com300MS=ms15724540
TXTdanielplan.com300google-site-verification=CytCWkikBEijH6v3IC8oqYGCUWg_4O5U6-Pvdu_WR54
TXTdanielplan.com300google-site-verification=DZnG-l1GAp0iogY7Y2KBnAn3bP4CK3ZP6Ff0iIfRRcE
TXTdanielplan.com300v=spf1 ip4:70.183.18.0/24 include:spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com a mx -all

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.