ctmfile.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #220,639
▼ 20,524
- Rank in TLD
- #93,099
▼ 9,070
- Referring Domains
- 209
▲ 10
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.2
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 17 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 35.0
- Referring Domains
- 209
- Linked Domains
- 541
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 19
10–19 24
20–29 44
30–39 36
40–49 39
50–59 22
60–69 13
70–79 7
80–89 4
90–100 1
Total 209
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| surveymonkey.com | 82.4 | #288 |
| deloitte.com | 81.7 | #333 |
| weforum.org | 81.2 | #374 |
| stackoverflow.blog | 76.9 | #879 |
| pymnts.com | 73.2 | #1,855 |
| splunk.com | 73.0 | #1,901 |
| xero.com | 72.8 | #1,971 |
| financesonline.com | 72.4 | #2,161 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 8 May 2009
- Last updated
- 4 May 2023
- Expires
- 8 May 2029 (915 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Mesh Digital Limited
Subdomain
www.ctmfile.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ctmfile.com | 300 | 62.182.19.220 |
| MX | ctmfile.com | 300 | 10 failover1.email-cluster.com |
| MX | ctmfile.com | 300 | 5 mx1.email-cluster.com |
| MX | ctmfile.com | 300 | 5 mx2.email-cluster.com |
| NS | ctmfile.com | 86400 | bayan.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | ctmfile.com | 86400 | rose.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | ctmfile.com | 1800 | bayan.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2418972948 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | ctmfile.com | 300 | google-site-verification=dbTf9Ue8ssQor8pxfGVUnwtUr96_pBK2ibqAQL4mBKE |
| TXT | ctmfile.com | 300 | v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:46.29.94.64 +include:relay.email-cluster.com +include:mailer3.uk-noc.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.