ctbb.show
- Domain Power ranking within .show: #73
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Only a small number of referring domains were found in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #1,433,349
▼ 152,360
- Rank in TLD
- #73
▼ 11
- Referring Domains
- 28
▲ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.6
- Subdomains
- 7
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 31.7
- Referring Domains
- 28
- Linked Domains
- 53
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 7
20–29 3
30–39 8
40–49 2
50–59 4
60–69 2
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 28
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| feedly.com | 78.6 | #641 |
| portswigger.net | 69.2 | #3,909 |
| danielmiessler.com | 63.5 | #9,407 |
| intigriti.com | 59.3 | #19,861 |
| yeswehack.com | 52.3 | #64,950 |
| ethiack.com | 50.9 | #82,479 |
| raindrop.page | 50.4 | #89,874 |
| tldrsec.com | 45.4 | #209,782 |
| criticalthinkingpodcast.io | 42.3 | #337,426 |
| jorianwoltjer.com | 35.4 | #917,337 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .show
No registration data could be retrieved.
Subdomain
ct.ctbb.showforms.ctbb.showjobs.ctbb.showl.ctbb.showlab.ctbb.showpentest.ctbb.showztw.ctbb.show
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ctbb.show | 14400 | 198.185.159.145 |
| NS | ctbb.show | 21600 | ns-cloud-e1.googledomains.com |
| NS | ctbb.show | 21600 | ns-cloud-e2.googledomains.com |
| NS | ctbb.show | 21600 | ns-cloud-e3.googledomains.com |
| NS | ctbb.show | 21600 | ns-cloud-e4.googledomains.com |
| SOA | ctbb.show | 21600 | ns-cloud-e1.googledomains.com. cloud-dns-hostmaster.google.com. 6 21600 3600 259200 300 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.