csna.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #455,013
▼ 30,457
- Rank in TLD
- #51,651
▼ 3,863
- Referring Domains
- 97
▼ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.2
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 27 yr 3 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 24.8
- Referring Domains
- 97
- Linked Domains
- 62
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 10
10–19 20
20–29 31
30–39 11
40–49 13
50–59 3
60–69 2
70–79 5
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 97
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| squarespace.com | 90.3 | #46 |
| iheart.com | 81.0 | #389 |
| givebutter.com | 76.1 | #1,022 |
| 988lifeline.org | 75.1 | #1,250 |
| donorbox.org | 74.2 | #1,483 |
| army.mil | 73.7 | #1,652 |
| idealist.org | 71.0 | #2,788 |
| uab.edu | 65.6 | #6,849 |
| uah.edu | 61.8 | #12,628 |
| aamu.edu | 52.2 | #66,662 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 16 Jul 1999
- Last updated
- 11 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 16 Jul 2028 (619 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
micollab.csna.orgsupport.csna.orgwww.csna.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | csna.org | 3600 | 198.49.23.144 |
| A | csna.org | 3600 | 198.49.23.145 |
| A | csna.org | 3600 | 198.185.159.144 |
| A | csna.org | 3600 | 198.185.159.145 |
| MX | csna.org | 900 | 1 smtp.google.com |
| NS | csna.org | 7200 | ns93.worldnic.com |
| NS | csna.org | 7200 | ns94.worldnic.com |
| TXT | csna.org | 3600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.