cryptofundresearch.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,499,597
▲ 257,306
- Rank in TLD
- #625,313
▲ 97,961
- Referring Domains
- 103
▲ 9
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.4
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 8 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 29.4
- Referring Domains
- 103
- Linked Domains
- 885
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 15
10–19 12
20–29 27
30–39 18
40–49 9
50–59 14
60–69 3
70–79 3
80–89 2
90–100 0
Total 103
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| columbia.edu | 85.2 | #151 |
| weforum.org | 81.2 | #374 |
| duke.edu | 76.0 | #1,046 |
| pymnts.com | 73.2 | #1,855 |
| cointelegraph.com | 71.4 | #2,603 |
| decrypt.co | 66.5 | #5,969 |
| bitcoin.com | 65.8 | #6,615 |
| theblock.co | 64.9 | #7,525 |
| cryptoslate.com | 59.2 | #20,319 |
| eth.limo | 59.1 | #20,749 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 23 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 12 Mar 2026
- Expires
- 23 Jan 2027 (79 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GoDaddy.com, LLC
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | cryptofundresearch.com | 300 | 192.190.81.100 |
| MX | cryptofundresearch.com | 300 | 0 mail.cryptofundresearch.com |
| NS | cryptofundresearch.com | 86400 | jerome.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | cryptofundresearch.com | 86400 | nelly.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | cryptofundresearch.com | 1800 | jerome.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2419214190 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | cryptofundresearch.com | 300 | v=spf1 ip4:192.190.81.100 +a +mx ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.