crunchperks.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #20,422,356
▲ 293,970
- Rank in TLD
- #8,906,282
▲ 108,489
- Referring Domains
- 5
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.8
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 9 yr 3 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.8
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 14.5
- Referring Domains
- 5
- Linked Domains
- 1,783
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 2
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 5
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| athletechnews.com | 53.0 | #58,718 |
| alumawellness.com | 14.7 | #20,757,992 |
| thecenterforurgentcare.com | 14.5 | #21,363,560 |
| ratiganfunnyfarm.com | 6.5 | #66,960,396 |
| thepublicrestorationcompany.com | 0.5 | #135,509,341 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 31 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 31 Jul 2027 (268 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- client transfer prohibited transfer prohibited client delete prohibited delete prohibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Squarespace Domains II LLC
Subdomain
www.crunchperks.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | crunchperks.com | 14400 | 198.202.211.1 |
| NS | crunchperks.com | 21600 | ns-cloud-c1.googledomains.com |
| NS | crunchperks.com | 21600 | ns-cloud-c4.googledomains.com |
| NS | crunchperks.com | 21600 | ns-cloud-c3.googledomains.com |
| NS | crunchperks.com | 21600 | ns-cloud-c2.googledomains.com |
| SOA | crunchperks.com | 21600 | ns-cloud-c1.googledomains.com. cloud-dns-hostmaster.google.com. 5 21600 3600 259200 300 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.