criticaster.com
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low.
- Global Rank
- #6,034,939
▼ 392,271
- Rank in TLD
- #2,536,069
▼ 168,716
- Referring Domains
- 7
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 20.4
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 15 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 20.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 16.1
- Referring Domains
- 7
- Linked Domains
- 1,740
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 4
20–29 2
30–39 1
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 7
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| oppalerts.com | 31.8 | #1,668,580 |
| garm.com | 26.2 | #3,992,109 |
| facts.dev | 24.5 | #5,097,452 |
| metascore.org | 16.1 | #17,167,583 |
| castleheatingkent.co.uk | 15.9 | #17,753,245 |
| llmstxt.info | 14.6 | #20,948,289 |
| topchoicefor.com | 13.9 | #23,004,347 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 29 May 2011
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2026
- Expires
- 29 May 2027 (205 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- TurnCommerce, Inc. DBA NameBright.com
Subdomain
www.criticaster.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | criticaster.com | 3600 | 216.150.1.1 |
| MX | criticaster.com | 10800 | 10 mx1.improvmx.com |
| MX | criticaster.com | 10800 | 20 mx2.improvmx.com |
| NS | criticaster.com | 10800 | ns2.namebrightdns.com |
| NS | criticaster.com | 10800 | ns1.namebrightdns.com |
| SOA | criticaster.com | 10800 | ns1.namebrightdns.com. dns.namebright.com. 2026110401 28800 5000 1209600 10800 |
| TXT | criticaster.com | 10800 | v=spf1 include:spf.improvmx.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.