cotemagazine.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #353,446
▲ 23,839
- Rank in TLD
- #146,855
▲ 8,184
- Referring Domains
- 235
▼ 7
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.1
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 12 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 20.0
- Referring Domains
- 235
- Linked Domains
- 2,189
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 29
10–19 87
20–29 78
30–39 29
40–49 7
50–59 2
60–69 0
70–79 1
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 235
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| bit.ly | 88.4 | #67 |
| infomaniak.com | 75.8 | #1,101 |
| montecarlosbm.com | 56.8 | #31,178 |
| nice.aeroport.fr | 53.1 | #57,617 |
| monacoyachtshow.com | 49.1 | #112,353 |
| ubp.com | 44.9 | #225,819 |
| grimaldiforum.com | 44.7 | #233,576 |
| fiabci.org | 43.5 | #282,499 |
| pa-sport.fr | 43.3 | #289,610 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 30 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2026
- Expires
- 17 Jun 2027 (224 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- REGISTER S.P.A.
Subdomain
webmail.cotemagazine.comwww.cotemagazine.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | cotemagazine.com | 600 | 164.132.67.65 |
| MX | cotemagazine.com | 600 | 5 mx-mibc-fr-08.mailinblack.com |
| NS | cotemagazine.com | 600 | ns1.amenworld.com |
| NS | cotemagazine.com | 600 | ns2.amenworld.com |
| SOA | cotemagazine.com | 600 | ns1.amenworld.com. root.amen.fr. 2026021802 86400 7200 2592000 300 |
| TXT | cotemagazine.com | 600 | v=spf1 a ip4:51.91.16.2 ip4:137.74.148.3 include:spf.mailinblack.com include:_spf.elasticemail.com include:spf.webapps.net ~all |
| TXT | cotemagazine.com | 900 | google-site-verification=ZpqSgrdzJP_YQG-4RiM-9hwZCnNDBlyusNqpbebEvNk |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.