cosmos.ru
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #161,065
▼ 12,885
- Rank in TLD
- #2,334
▼ 57
- Referring Domains
- 443
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.7
- Subdomains
- 119
- Domain age
- 29 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 35.7
- Referring Domains
- 443
- Linked Domains
- 2,019
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 31
10–19 63
20–29 78
30–39 79
40–49 76
50–59 68
60–69 34
70–79 10
80–89 2
90–100 2
Total 443
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| mail.ru | 83.1 | #245 |
| nasa.gov | 81.1 | #383 |
| rambler.ru | 76.3 | #991 |
| livejournal.com | 75.9 | #1,065 |
| rbc.ru | 75.7 | #1,129 |
| mpg.de | 74.3 | #1,459 |
| asu.edu | 74.1 | #1,528 |
| esa.int | 72.9 | #1,950 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ruRussia
- Registration date
- 24 Oct 1997
- Expires
- 30 Nov 2026 (25 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- REGISTERED DELEGATED VERIFIED
- Registry
- Coordination Center for TLD RU
- Registrar
- RU-CENTER-RU
Subdomain
9icpdp.cosmos.ruheaconf.archive.cosmos.rukmu.archive.cosmos.ruaspirantura.cosmos.ruccsds.cosmos.ruchibis.cosmos.ruwww.chibis.cosmos.ruconvergence.cosmos.rudisk.cosmos.rudni.cosmos.rudnk.cosmos.ruexo2014.cosmos.ruexomars.cosmos.ruglcw2013.cosmos.rugringauz100.cosmos.ruhea.cosmos.rumeeting.hea.cosmos.ruheaconf.cosmos.ruhepro6.cosmos.ruiki.cosmos.ru
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| MX | cosmos.ru | 3600 | 5 mx.iki.rssi.ru |
| NS | cosmos.ru | 300 | ns2.rssi.ru |
| NS | cosmos.ru | 300 | ns.rssi.ru |
| SOA | cosmos.ru | 300 | ns.rssi.ru. dns.rssi.ru. 2026110304 1800 7200 604800 60 |
| TXT | cosmos.ru | 300 | v=spf1 +mx +ip4:193.232.0.0/19 +ip4:193.232.212.0/24 +ip4:62.61.20.64/27 +ip4:62.61.28.0/24 +ip4:195.170.224.30 -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.