Skip to content

copterpro.de

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
33.5
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#1,288,769

▼ 123,795

Rank in TLD
#58,845

▼ 5,598

Referring Domains
56

▼ 4

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
21.7
Subdomains
6
Domain age
–

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
gofundme.com81.0#393
podigee.io72.9#1,939
lokalhelden.ch50.9#83,110
unternehmerjournal.de45.4#208,994
gewinnermagazin.de42.6#324,271
expertenmarkt.de40.5#447,348
das-angebot.de39.9#489,273
drohnen.de39.7#506,137
globe-flight.de39.1#547,934
consultingmagazin.de36.4#788,127

Basic Information

Last updated
23 Jan 2020
Domain statuses
active
Registry
DENIC eG

Subdomain

academy.copterpro.defiles.copterpro.dekarriere.copterpro.dewww.karriere.copterpro.deshopalt.copterpro.dewww.copterpro.de

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Acopterpro.de360094.249.141.70
MXcopterpro.de3001 mx1.larksuite.com
MXcopterpro.de3005 mx2.larksuite.com
MXcopterpro.de30010 mx3.larksuite.com
NScopterpro.de86400ns1083.ui-dns.com
NScopterpro.de86400ns1076.ui-dns.biz
NScopterpro.de86400ns1016.ui-dns.org
NScopterpro.de86400ns1070.ui-dns.de
SOAcopterpro.de86400ns1016.ui-dns.org. hostmaster.1und1.com. 2017060199 28800 7200 604800 600
TXTcopterpro.de300v=spf1 include:spf.onlarksuite.com include:_spf-eu.ionos.com ip4:94.249.141.66 a:server.hosting01.de ~all
TXTcopterpro.de3600google-site-verification=sekWJUzknrbQ1wQ3hL6lMrWbiAPyAoT-C5aAElXUUpE
TXTcopterpro.de300klaviyo-site-verification=public_API_key
TXTcopterpro.de3600klaviyo-site-verification=UW24XL
TXTcopterpro.de300verification-code-site-App_lark=1oGPX75nGzkyWETw8dzv

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.