Skip to content

cna.org

  • Domain Power global ranking: #49,042

Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from a broad range of domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
54.1
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#49,042

▼ 2,638

Rank in TLD
#5,701

▼ 309

Referring Domains
1,689

▲ 38

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
36.0
Subdomains
5
Domain age
33 yr 7 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
google.com99.8#1
apple.com93.5#22
wikipedia.org91.8#34
europa.eu90.5#44
weebly.com87.4#85
forbes.com86.4#112
bund.de85.4#144
columbia.edu85.2#151
www.gov.uk84.5#169
substack.com84.4#173

Basic Information

TLD
.org
Registration date
23 Mar 1993
Last updated
11 Aug 2026
Expires
24 Mar 2029 (870 days remaining)
Registrar
Network Solutions, LLC

Subdomain

www.conference.cna.orgsecurityandclimate.cna.orgwww.securityandclimate.cna.orgweb.cna.orgwww.cna.org

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Acna.org3600192.124.249.155
MXcna.org360010 mxa-0038b602.gslb.gpphosted.com
MXcna.org360010 mxb-0038b602.gslb.gpphosted.com
NScna.org3600auth2.dns.cogentco.com
NScna.org3600auth1.dns.cogentco.com
SOAcna.org3600shbdmzdns. netadmin.cna.org. 2020022039 3600 900 2419200 3600
TXTcna.org3600v=spf1 include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.vali.email ~all
TXTcna.org3600MS=ms79764124
TXTcna.org3600MS=E39DDDAC36B153A68C673E93B16323D6B6026760
TXTcna.org3600ZOOM_verify_-n2qqSm_Rd-TmlXS75Witw
TXTcna.org3600docusign=384bf0f7-a0e4-486d-804a-7cefcd604629
TXTcna.org36001LFL7ptke9h4fT/lQlgjg1sU0yX/NKSGzKStO00Mrk9px1GYELC0Yv0hniILw9ywsiK2OOYUGBle+pViEwTftA==

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Warning

The SPF check could not be completed because of too many DNS references or macros.

DMARC
Valid

DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.