cmsanalyzer.pl
This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.
- Global Rank
- #11,133,211
▲ 22,538
- Rank in TLD
- #128,897
▲ 5,007
- Referring Domains
- 17
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.9
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 1 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.1
- Referring Domains
- 17
- Linked Domains
- 386
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 3
20–29 5
30–39 3
40–49 3
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 17
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| safariclub.org | 50.4 | #90,344 |
| inzynierbudownictwa.pl | 47.9 | #137,194 |
| wbolt.com | 45.5 | #205,637 |
| centroarts.com | 41.1 | #411,229 |
| optyczne.pl | 38.8 | #567,590 |
| maldonadonoticias.com | 33.7 | #1,236,490 |
| skokinarciarskie.pl | 31.7 | #1,688,383 |
| innovative-learning.com | 29.9 | #2,250,099 |
| braintrust.gr | 28.1 | #3,018,201 |
| bazar.it | 25.4 | #4,507,554 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .plPoland
- Registration date
- 31 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 29 Dec 2025
- Expires
- 31 Dec 2026 (56 days remaining)
- Registrar
- PERSKIMEDIA Szymon Perski
Subdomain
www.cmsanalyzer.pl
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | cmsanalyzer.pl | 14400 | 195.78.67.30 |
| MX | cmsanalyzer.pl | 14400 | 10 mail.cmsanalyzer.pl |
| NS | cmsanalyzer.pl | 14400 | ns3.cyberfolks.pl |
| NS | cmsanalyzer.pl | 14400 | ns1.cyberfolks.pl |
| NS | cmsanalyzer.pl | 14400 | ns2.cyberfolks.pl |
| SOA | cmsanalyzer.pl | 14400 | ns1.cyberfolks.pl. hostmaster.cmsanalyzer.pl. 2025010301 14400 3600 1209600 3600 |
| TXT | cmsanalyzer.pl | 14400 | v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.cyberfolks.pl -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.