ciudadseva.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #161,642
▼ 148,879
- Rank in TLD
- #68,952
▼ 62,912
- Referring Domains
- 1,437
▼ 19
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.8
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 25 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.8
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.4
- Referring Domains
- 1,437
- Linked Domains
- 624
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 174
10–19 443
20–29 462
30–39 149
40–49 86
50–59 55
60–69 47
70–79 15
80–89 5
90–100 1
Total 1,437
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| wikimedia.org | 85.2 | #150 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| tinyurl.com | 84.1 | #186 |
| mit.edu | 83.2 | #238 |
| upenn.edu | 78.7 | #620 |
| vice.com | 77.6 | #760 |
| usc.edu | 76.6 | #937 |
| itch.io | 76.5 | #951 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 15 Nov 2000
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2025
- Expires
- 15 Nov 2030 (1,471 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
www.ciudadseva.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ciudadseva.com | 10800 | 72.167.107.23 |
| MX | ciudadseva.com | 3600 | 0 mail.ciudadseva.com |
| NS | ciudadseva.com | 3600 | ns09.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | ciudadseva.com | 3600 | ns10.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | ciudadseva.com | 3600 | ns09.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2025072500 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | ciudadseva.com | 3600 | google-site-verification=PGImHuH41h43ZHtlbvAl7GLAkIPkzTqUoRkK71Six7U |
| TXT | ciudadseva.com | 3600 | v=spf1 a mx ptr include:secureserver.net ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.