cirm-math.fr
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #78,208
▼ 2,253
- Rank in TLD
- #1,186
▼ 6
- Referring Domains
- 521
▼ 17
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 42.1
- Subdomains
- 13
- Domain age
- 12 yr 3 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 42.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 40.1
- Referring Domains
- 521
- Linked Domains
- 2,289
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 18
10–19 87
20–29 76
30–39 78
40–49 44
50–59 81
60–69 96
70–79 33
80–89 6
90–100 2
Total 521
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| columbia.edu | 85.2 | #151 |
| stanford.edu | 83.3 | #237 |
| mit.edu | 83.2 | #238 |
| nvidia.com | 81.0 | #396 |
| berkeley.edu | 80.7 | #415 |
| ox.ac.uk | 78.9 | #601 |
| princeton.edu | 77.8 | #731 |
Basic Information
Subdomain
accueil.cirm-math.frapp.cirm-math.frbbb1.cirm-math.frbibli.cirm-math.frcirmbox.cirm-math.frcirmdoc.cirm-math.frconferences.cirm-math.frfaq-info.cirm-math.frfconferences.cirm-math.frlibrary.cirm-math.frvideos.cirm-math.frwebconf.cirm-math.frwww.cirm-math.fr
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| MX | cirm-math.fr | 600 | 200 secours.cirm-math.fr |
| MX | cirm-math.fr | 600 | 100 arago.cirm-math.fr |
| NS | cirm-math.fr | 600 | dns1.math.cnrs.fr |
| NS | cirm-math.fr | 600 | dns2.math.cnrs.fr |
| SOA | cirm-math.fr | 600 | dns1.math.cnrs.fr. support.math.cnrs.fr. 2024022725 21600 3600 3600000 43200 |
| TXT | cirm-math.fr | 600 | v=spf1 +mx ?all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
A mail server hostname could not be resolved to an IP address.
- SPF
- Warning
This SPF policy uses +all or has no all mechanism. Check whether the sender restrictions are appropriate, and consider ~all or -all if needed.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.