cim.io
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #444,829
▼ 24,089
- Rank in TLD
- #9,022
▼ 672
- Referring Domains
- 327
▲ 14
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.5
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 9 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 27.5
- Referring Domains
- 327
- Linked Domains
- 456
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 36
10–19 73
20–29 78
30–39 61
40–49 39
50–59 26
60–69 7
70–79 2
80–89 5
90–100 0
Total 327
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| ca.gov | 83.6 | #211 |
| mit.edu | 83.2 | #238 |
| webflow.com | 80.7 | #417 |
| berkeley.edu | 80.7 | #415 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| alibaba.com | 77.4 | #783 |
| oregonstate.edu | 70.5 | #3,072 |
| fas.org | 69.8 | #3,491 |
| amazon.science | 67.8 | #4,878 |
| muni.cz | 66.4 | #6,057 |
Basic Information
- Registration date
- 9 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 9 Jan 2027 (65 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Internet Computer Bureau Limited
- Registrar
- GANDI SAS
Subdomain
connect.cim.iosupport.cim.iotrust.cim.iowww.cim.io
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | cim.io | 300 | 198.202.211.1 |
| MX | cim.io | 300 | 1 aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | cim.io | 300 | 10 aspmx2.googlemail.com |
| MX | cim.io | 300 | 10 aspmx3.googlemail.com |
| MX | cim.io | 300 | 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | cim.io | 300 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | cim.io | 172800 | ns-1027.awsdns-00.org |
| NS | cim.io | 172800 | ns-1834.awsdns-37.co.uk |
| NS | cim.io | 172800 | ns-380.awsdns-47.com |
| NS | cim.io | 172800 | ns-980.awsdns-58.net |
| SOA | cim.io | 900 | ns-1834.awsdns-37.co.uk. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | cim.io | 300 | google-site-verification=JOsR17_McxwUHdCRxRfRYdnjCO4WjKadY1zdiDg-yGs |
| TXT | cim.io | 300 | v=spf1 include:_u.cim.io._spf.smart.ondmarc.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.