chriswoebken.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,825,524
▼ 875,266
- Rank in TLD
- #763,586
▼ 373,063
- Referring Domains
- 53
▲ 6
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.3
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 19 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 32.6
- Referring Domains
- 53
- Linked Domains
- 76
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 4
10–19 12
20–29 7
30–39 10
40–49 10
50–59 2
60–69 2
70–79 4
80–89 2
90–100 0
Total 53
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| harvard.edu | 83.6 | #218 |
| ted.com | 81.0 | #390 |
| vice.com | 77.6 | #760 |
| rutgers.edu | 75.3 | #1,212 |
| podigee.io | 72.9 | #1,939 |
| tistory.com | 72.1 | #2,307 |
| dazeddigital.com | 65.9 | #6,516 |
| fordham.edu | 65.6 | #6,852 |
| triplepundit.com | 57.2 | #28,901 |
| eyebeam.org | 51.3 | #77,222 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 22 May 2007
- Last updated
- 21 May 2026
- Expires
- 22 May 2027 (198 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Mesh Digital Limited
Subdomain
www.chriswoebken.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | chriswoebken.com | 50 | 3.234.189.133 |
| A | chriswoebken.com | 50 | 3.215.100.79 |
| MX | chriswoebken.com | 3600 | 0 chriswoebken-com.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | chriswoebken.com | 86400 | ns2.cargocollective.com |
| NS | chriswoebken.com | 86400 | ns1.cargocollective.com |
| SOA | chriswoebken.com | 86400 | ns1.cargocollective.com. hostmaster.chriswoebken.com. 2025092805 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | chriswoebken.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:secureserver.net -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.