chrisam.es
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #113,442
▲ 7,950
- Rank in TLD
- #770
▲ 29
- Referring Domains
- 818
▼ 31
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 12.2
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 12.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 10.4
- Referring Domains
- 818
- Linked Domains
- 58
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 396
10–19 266
20–29 109
30–39 21
40–49 13
50–59 11
60–69 2
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 818
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| lyrathemes.com | 61.5 | #13,442 |
| elmastudio.de | 60.5 | #15,970 |
| bavotasan.com | 59.7 | #18,510 |
| themehall.com | 59.1 | #20,557 |
| themonic.com | 58.6 | #22,483 |
| torquemag.io | 57.8 | #26,170 |
| firabarcelona.com | 55.2 | #40,673 |
| gavick.com | 55.1 | #41,031 |
| inesctec.pt | 54.2 | #47,534 |
| premiumresponsive.com | 51.9 | #69,595 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .esSpain
No registration data could be retrieved.
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | chrisam.es | 3600 | 198.49.23.145 |
| MX | chrisam.es | 3600 | 1 aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | chrisam.es | 3600 | 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | chrisam.es | 3600 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | chrisam.es | 3600 | 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | chrisam.es | 3600 | 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | chrisam.es | 3600 | dns2.iwantmyname.com |
| NS | chrisam.es | 3600 | dns3.iwantmyname.com |
| NS | chrisam.es | 3600 | dns1.iwantmyname.com |
| SOA | chrisam.es | 3600 | dns2.iwantmyname.com. dnsadmin.iwantmyname.com. 2026102601 43200 900 1209600 3600 |
| TXT | chrisam.es | 3600 | MS=DBB2A6CA8386B365F1BA6CD4E9CD6961DA4C9482 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.