chbeck.de
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #35,451
▼ 411
- Rank in TLD
- #1,227
▲ 44
- Referring Domains
- 2,416
▼ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.7
- Subdomains
- 5
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 27.7
- Referring Domains
- 2,416
- Linked Domains
- 515
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 147
10–19 479
20–29 713
30–39 495
40–49 273
50–59 150
60–69 114
70–79 34
80–89 9
90–100 2
Total 2,416
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| google.de | 86.9 | #97 |
| bund.de | 85.4 | #144 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| tinyurl.com | 84.1 | #186 |
| wiley.com | 83.5 | #220 |
| google.co.uk | 82.6 | #275 |
| berkeley.edu | 80.7 | #415 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 9 Nov 2007
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
cms.chbeck.deelibrary.chbeck.dekarriere.chbeck.dewww.chbeck.dewww.www.chbeck.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | chbeck.de | 900 | 52.138.196.70 |
| MX | chbeck.de | 900 | 0 chbeck-de.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | chbeck.de | 900 | pns.dtag.de |
| NS | chbeck.de | 900 | secondary006.dtag.net |
| SOA | chbeck.de | 900 | pns.dtag.de. hostmaster.beck.de. 2026102201 10000 1800 604800 40000 |
| TXT | chbeck.de | 900 | s7pnpaci7etpdts46b25re6k0s |
| TXT | chbeck.de | 900 | chbeck-live.azurewebsites.net |
| TXT | chbeck.de | 900 | k7jvmacr7mc24aggtmlqimtacq |
| TXT | chbeck.de | 900 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
| TXT | chbeck.de | 900 | amazonses:AgjJ8osomA0KEgqbTm21MrTIRFY1LWDtZHFGtJJtkpA= |
| TXT | chbeck.de | 900 | ut4aur4amhqp1gb46f8cbl5bvf |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.