chadpainter.net
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low.
- Global Rank
- #137,922,043
▼ 1,896,451
- Rank in TLD
- #4,189,174
▼ 41,201
- Referring Domains
- 0
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 0.0
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 20 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 0.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 0.0
- Referring Domains
- 0
- Linked Domains
- 2
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 0
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 0
Referring Domains
No data
Basic Information
- TLD
- .net
- Registration date
- 2 Nov 2006
- Last updated
- 3 Nov 2026
- Expires
- 2 Nov 2027 (362 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Register.com - Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | chadpainter.net | 300 | 34.69.219.172 |
| MX | chadpainter.net | 300 | 2 newman-dfw-lin.mirus.io |
| MX | chadpainter.net | 300 | 1 newman-nyc-do.mirus.io |
| NS | chadpainter.net | 3600 | ns2.mir.us |
| NS | chadpainter.net | 3600 | ns-cloud-a2.googledomains.com |
| NS | chadpainter.net | 3600 | ns-cloud-a4.googledomains.com |
| NS | chadpainter.net | 3600 | ns1.mirusresearch.com |
| NS | chadpainter.net | 3600 | ns-cloud-a1.googledomains.com |
| NS | chadpainter.net | 3600 | ns-cloud-a3.googledomains.com |
| SOA | chadpainter.net | 3600 | ns1.mirusresearch.com. hostmaster.mirusresearch.com. 2026092702 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | chadpainter.net | 300 | v=spf1 +a +mx +include:spf.mtasv.net -all |
| TXT | chadpainter.net | 300 | google-site-verification=saZ6a2aWZ13DvZ387TVfkO9vzy-VhVj-bzCV0E0LCWE |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.