cert.lv
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #122,766
▲ 2,815
- Rank in TLD
- #66
▲ 3
- Referring Domains
- 248
▲ 19
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.7
- Subdomains
- 5
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 33.2
- Referring Domains
- 248
- Linked Domains
- 245
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 14
10–19 43
20–29 47
30–39 55
40–49 43
50–59 29
60–69 10
70–79 2
80–89 1
90–100 4
Total 248
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| pwc.com | 80.1 | #478 |
| helpnetsecurity.com | 70.8 | #2,897 |
| sans.org | 70.4 | #3,140 |
| first.org | 69.8 | #3,476 |
| comodo.com | 69.2 | #3,906 |
| therecord.media | 69.0 | #4,092 |
Basic Information
Subdomain
blw.cert.lvcvd.cert.lvdropit.cert.lvezis.int.cert.lvwww.cert.lv
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | cert.lv | 3214 | 212.70.163.189 |
| MX | cert.lv | 3600 | 10 mx.latnet.lv |
| MX | cert.lv | 3600 | 50 mx2.latnet.lv |
| MX | cert.lv | 3600 | 100 mx3.latnet.lv |
| NS | cert.lv | 3600 | ns1.cert.lv |
| NS | cert.lv | 3600 | ns3.cert.lv |
| NS | cert.lv | 3600 | nsk.cert.lv |
| SOA | cert.lv | 3600 | ns1.cert.lv. cert.cert.lv. 2024022452 10800 3600 1814400 3600 |
| TXT | cert.lv | 3600 | google-site-verification=Ijffe1f1sUjy-2HYmZRUj5vMBhFRqtxQEZQisRqh2NM |
| TXT | cert.lv | 3600 | cisco-ci-domain-verification=14bcc409bf9ea1eb69b9c422d4f4b5f58ff1c620177826fd639d149235ae43d6 |
| TXT | cert.lv | 3600 | v=spf1 mx include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv ip4:85.254.193.0/24 ip4:193.174.13.200 ip4:145.0.2.40 ip4:38.111.193.7 -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.