Skip to content

cerfplus.org

  • Domain Power global ranking: #64,117

Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high. This domain was registered at least 10 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
52.4
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#64,117

▼ 3,293

Rank in TLD
#7,480

▼ 446

Referring Domains
616

▲ 39

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
33.6
Subdomains
2
Domain age
17 yr 4 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
adobe.com90.7#43
squarespace.com90.3#46
outlook.com86.2#119
etsy.com84.0#193
ca.gov83.6#211
constantcontact.com80.6#429
latimes.com79.8#511
libsyn.com78.5#653
illinois.edu76.2#1,008
wildapricot.org74.0#1,551

Basic Information

TLD
.org
Registration date
17 Jun 2009
Last updated
11 Aug 2026
Expires
17 Jun 2027 (224 days remaining)
Registrar
GoDaddy.com, LLC

Subdomain

apply.cerfplus.orgwww.cerfplus.org

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Acerfplus.org300104.21.50.105
Acerfplus.org300172.67.204.238
AAAAcerfplus.org3002606:4700:3035::6815:3269
AAAAcerfplus.org3002606:4700:3037::ac43:ccee
MXcerfplus.org30010 aspmx.l.google.com
MXcerfplus.org30020 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
MXcerfplus.org30030 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
MXcerfplus.org30040 aspmx2.googlemail.com
MXcerfplus.org30050 aspmx3.googlemail.com
NScerfplus.org86400seamus.ns.cloudflare.com
NScerfplus.org86400suzanne.ns.cloudflare.com
SOAcerfplus.org1800seamus.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2419295893 10000 2400 604800 1800
TXTcerfplus.org30000D300000000TKV=1TBNt00000002hl
TXTcerfplus.org300v=spf1 mx include:_spf.google.com include:spf.predictiveresponse.net include:spf1.formassembly.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.