Skip to content

cereq.fr

Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.

Domain Power Rank
50.4
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#90,198

▼ 1,630

Rank in TLD
#1,354

▲ 6

Referring Domains
789

▲ 15

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
33.0
Subdomains
19
Domain age
30 yr 9 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
wikipedia.org91.8#34
europa.eu90.5#44
mit.edu83.2#238
entrepreneur.com78.3#670
free.fr78.2#681
economie.gouv.fr77.0#849
over-blog.com72.3#2,199
ning.com72.1#2,291
franceinfo.fr71.9#2,400
cnrs.fr71.9#2,383

Basic Information

Registration date
21 Jan 1996
Last updated
28 Jan 2025
Expires
21 Jan 2027 (77 days remaining)
Domain statuses
ACTIVE
Registrar
GIP RENATER

Subdomain

biennale2015.cereq.frbiennale2017.cereq.frbilan-programme.cereq.frbox.cereq.fridp4.cereq.freye.infos.cereq.frjdl2018.cereq.frjeunes-et-societes.cereq.frmimosa.cereq.frpmb.cereq.frpmb5.cereq.frpmbz.cereq.frportail.cereq.frpp.cereq.frpreprod.cereq.frreflet.cereq.frsun1.cereq.frwebmail.cereq.frwww.cereq.fr

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Acereq.fr43200139.124.146.14
MXcereq.fr4320010 cereq-fr.mail.protection.outlook.com
NScereq.fr43200sun1.cereq.fr
NScereq.fr43200ns1.univmed.fr
SOAcereq.fr43200sun1.cereq.fr. postmaster.cereq.fr. 2026102303 21600 3600 3600000 43200
TXTcereq.fr43200canva-domain-verify=b4d92ee1-7846-4cbc-a708-a498418bfe9d
TXTcereq.fr43200canva-site-verification=Co_OW_vdSjkMG2D641KQOQ
TXTcereq.fr43200MS=ms24345855
TXTcereq.fr43200linkedin-site-verification=e7ffa8a7-728e-4e3c-8db8-9de64380a3a8
TXTcereq.fr43200v=spf1 mx include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:spf.mailjet.com include:spf.tipimail.com ip4:194.167.190.130 ~all

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.