cemas.io
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #89,066
▼ 370
- Rank in TLD
- #2,228
▼ 55
- Referring Domains
- 383
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 37.9
- Subdomains
- 7
- Domain age
- 5 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 37.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 36.5
- Referring Domains
- 383
- Linked Domains
- 331
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 15
10–19 39
20–29 81
30–39 77
40–49 86
50–59 47
60–69 26
70–79 9
80–89 1
90–100 2
Total 383
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| vice.com | 77.6 | #760 |
| nrw.de | 76.9 | #885 |
| klicksafe.de | 76.0 | #1,052 |
| acast.com | 74.7 | #1,366 |
| sueddeutsche.de | 74.5 | #1,411 |
| podigee.io | 72.9 | #1,939 |
| saferinternet.at | 72.8 | #1,987 |
Basic Information
- Registration date
- 22 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 22 Dec 2027 (412 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- Internet Computer Bureau Limited
- Registrar
- Key-Systems GmbH
Subdomain
auth.cemas.iobtw2025.cemas.iocrm.cemas.iofiles.cemas.ioreport.cemas.iotest.cemas.iowww.cemas.io
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | cemas.io | 86400 | 216.150.1.1 |
| MX | cemas.io | 86400 | 10 cemas-io.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | cemas.io | 86400 | hydrogen.ns.hetzner.com |
| NS | cemas.io | 86400 | oxygen.ns.hetzner.com |
| NS | cemas.io | 86400 | helium.ns.hetzner.de |
| SOA | cemas.io | 86400 | hydrogen.ns.hetzner.com. dns.hetzner.com. 2026102213 86400 10800 3600000 3600 |
| TXT | cemas.io | 86400 | google-site-verification=D8-h6mBndIFxGZ5abmEOnCczhvxUiriNUcWukUgUcoE |
| TXT | cemas.io | 86400 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:spf.civilisten.io ~all |
| TXT | cemas.io | 86400 | apple-domain-verification=TN4rlf24IrW1Bp7y |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.