cel.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,072,525
▼ 207,406
- Rank in TLD
- #442,466
▼ 88,167
- Referring Domains
- 132
▼ 12
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.0
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 31 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.4
- Referring Domains
- 132
- Linked Domains
- 24
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 30
10–19 32
20–29 20
30–39 16
40–49 14
50–59 13
60–69 6
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 132
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| ti.com | 70.0 | #3,409 |
| itmedia.co.jp | 69.5 | #3,689 |
| ifixit.com | 65.5 | #6,892 |
| digikey.com | 65.0 | #7,433 |
| hackaday.com | 64.5 | #8,103 |
| prlog.org | 64.1 | #8,631 |
| unb.ca | 62.4 | #11,392 |
| renesas.com | 59.8 | #18,217 |
| lightwaveonline.com | 58.1 | #24,837 |
| phrack.org | 58.1 | #24,645 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 25 Feb 1995
- Last updated
- 26 Feb 2024
- Expires
- 26 Feb 2034 (2,670 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
cortet.cel.commeshconnect.cel.comwww.cel.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | cel.com | 7200 | 35.209.93.0 |
| MX | cel.com | 7200 | 10 d105092a.ess.barracudanetworks.com |
| MX | cel.com | 7200 | 20 d105092b.ess.barracudanetworks.com |
| NS | cel.com | 7200 | ns32.worldnic.com |
| NS | cel.com | 7200 | ns31.worldnic.com |
| SOA | cel.com | 7200 | NS31.WORLDNIC.com. namehost.WORLDNIC.com. 126092317 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | cel.com | 3600 | TUB-8FE-DER |
| TXT | cel.com | 3600 | MS=ms55207010 |
| TXT | cel.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com ip4:23.92.186.155 include:spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:9253423.spf06.hubspotemail.net ~all |
| TXT | cel.com | 7200 | f787cc1dab7e79ed7bec7388b22e6cd9 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.