cdjournal.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #118,086
▼ 5,645
- Rank in TLD
- #51,291
▼ 3,284
- Referring Domains
- 1,194
▼ 56
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.1
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 27 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.3
- Referring Domains
- 1,194
- Linked Domains
- 5,239
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 275
10–19 400
20–29 277
30–39 118
40–49 57
50–59 27
60–69 20
70–79 16
80–89 2
90–100 2
Total 1,194
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| hatena.ne.jp | 82.7 | #270 |
| ameblo.jp | 80.3 | #460 |
| fc2.com | 77.6 | #755 |
| yale.edu | 77.6 | #756 |
| uchicago.edu | 76.7 | #923 |
| shop-pro.jp | 76.1 | #1,030 |
| st-hatena.com | 75.6 | #1,134 |
| thebase.in | 75.6 | #1,135 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 25 Nov 1998
- Last updated
- 19 Nov 2025
- Expires
- 24 Nov 2026 (19 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Japan Registry Services Co.,Ltd.(JPRS)
Subdomain
artist.cdjournal.comwww.cdjournal.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | cdjournal.com | 3600 | 202.212.133.200 |
| MX | cdjournal.com | 3600 | 100 mxi.alpha-prm.jp |
| NS | cdjournal.com | 262 | fjkdns13.alpha-prm.jp |
| NS | cdjournal.com | 262 | fjkdns12.alpha-prm.jp |
| NS | cdjournal.com | 262 | fjkdns11.alpha-prm.jp |
| SOA | cdjournal.com | 3600 | fjkdns99.alpha-prm.jp. hostmaster.alpha-prm.jp. 2026093001 10800 3600 604800 1800 |
| TXT | cdjournal.com | 3600 | v=spf1 ip4:210.136.111.75/32 include:spf.alpha-prm.jp ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.