ccilf.pt
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,471,556
▼ 420,379
- Rank in TLD
- #2,664
▼ 642
- Referring Domains
- 89
▼ 7
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.6
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 30 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 24.3
- Referring Domains
- 89
- Linked Domains
- 104
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 11
10–19 18
20–29 26
30–39 15
40–49 11
50–59 5
60–69 1
70–79 1
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 89
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| outlook.com | 86.2 | #119 |
| economie.gouv.fr | 77.0 | #849 |
| hautsdefrance.fr | 60.8 | #15,224 |
| lepetitjournal.com | 59.4 | #19,555 |
| iapmei.pt | 55.8 | #36,835 |
| inesctec.pt | 54.2 | #47,534 |
| portugalglobal.pt | 51.7 | #72,664 |
| expat.com | 50.4 | #90,099 |
| pharmaboardroom.com | 46.9 | #163,724 |
| ccifrance-international.org | 45.0 | #223,886 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ptPortugal
- Registration date
- 5 Jun 1996
- Expires
- 11 Feb 2027 (98 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Registered
- Registry
- Associação DNS.PT
Subdomain
mail.ccilf.ptwww.ccilf.pt
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ccilf.pt | 3600 | 217.115.171.13 |
| MX | ccilf.pt | 3600 | 0 ccilf-pt.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | ccilf.pt | 3600 | ns2.pointerns.com |
| NS | ccilf.pt | 3600 | ns1.pointerns.com |
| SOA | ccilf.pt | 7200 | ns1.pointerns.com. hostmaster.ccilf.pt. 2026061500 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | ccilf.pt | 3600 | google-site-verification=2-NUoHWqefsppSUa0C9Me1Am8N5aLYH3GWaV9Do82dY |
| TXT | ccilf.pt | 3600 | v=spf1 +a +mx +include:mx.ovh.com +include:spf.oximailing.com +ip4:188.114.81.4 +include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
| TXT | ccilf.pt | 3600 | MS=ms18609377 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.