cap-journal.org
This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.
- Global Rank
- #23,717,146
▼ 423,355
- Rank in TLD
- #1,423,969
▼ 31,491
- Referring Domains
- 3
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 44.5
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 1 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 44.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 45.7
- Referring Domains
- 3
- Linked Domains
- 26
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 0
20–29 0
30–39 1
40–49 1
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 3
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| rcaap.pt | 53.5 | #53,751 |
| edch.eu | 45.7 | #198,131 |
| wisethorough.com | 34.3 | #1,124,005 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 22 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 26 Jan 2026
- Expires
- 22 Feb 2027 (109 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- NAMECHEAP INC
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | cap-journal.org | 60 | 185.12.116.30 |
| MX | cap-journal.org | 1800 | 10 eforward1.registrar-servers.com |
| MX | cap-journal.org | 1800 | 10 eforward2.registrar-servers.com |
| MX | cap-journal.org | 1800 | 10 eforward3.registrar-servers.com |
| MX | cap-journal.org | 1800 | 15 eforward4.registrar-servers.com |
| MX | cap-journal.org | 1800 | 20 eforward5.registrar-servers.com |
| NS | cap-journal.org | 1800 | dns1.registrar-servers.com |
| NS | cap-journal.org | 1800 | dns2.registrar-servers.com |
| SOA | cap-journal.org | 3601 | dns1.registrar-servers.com. hostmaster.registrar-servers.com. 1787577388 43200 3600 604800 3601 |
| TXT | cap-journal.org | 1800 | v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.