candyupdate.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #274,221
▲ 4,068,680
- Rank in TLD
- #114,694
▲ 1,707,075
- Referring Domains
- 224
▲ 83
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 38.6
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 3 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 38.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 33.4
- Referring Domains
- 224
- Linked Domains
- 320
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 2
20–29 101
30–39 25
40–49 45
50–59 35
60–69 13
70–79 3
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 224
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.ca | 78.1 | #690 |
| adsrvr.org | 74.0 | #1,566 |
| shareaholic.com | 70.1 | #3,316 |
| wp.pl | 66.4 | #6,091 |
| gov.hr | 66.1 | #6,344 |
| restaurant.org | 65.7 | #6,725 |
| google.tn | 65.3 | #7,167 |
| google.rs | 64.6 | #7,969 |
| google.ee | 63.9 | #8,828 |
| escardio.org | 63.7 | #9,156 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 28 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2026
- Expires
- 28 Aug 2027 (296 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- HOSTINGER operations, UAB
Subdomain
www.candyupdate.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | candyupdate.com | 60 | 69.163.181.130 |
| MX | candyupdate.com | 60 | 0 mx2.mailchannels.net |
| MX | candyupdate.com | 60 | 0 mx1.mailchannels.net |
| NS | candyupdate.com | 14400 | ns2.dreamhost.com |
| NS | candyupdate.com | 14400 | ns1.dreamhost.com |
| NS | candyupdate.com | 14400 | ns3.dreamhost.com |
| SOA | candyupdate.com | 60 | ns1.dreamhost.com. hostmaster.dreamhost.com. 2026100603 21490 600 1814400 60 |
| TXT | candyupdate.com | 60 | v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.