cakecamp.com
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #51,254,779
▲ 4,504,521
- Rank in TLD
- #23,524,239
▲ 2,238,434
- Referring Domains
- 3
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 15.7
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 21 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 15.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 15.3
- Referring Domains
- 3
- Linked Domains
- 6
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 3
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 3
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| simplysweetsaz.blogspot.com | 16.5 | #16,221,983 |
| flourconfections.blogspot.com | 15.3 | #19,087,325 |
| cakelava.blogspot.com | 15.3 | #19,182,835 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 25 Jan 2005
- Last updated
- 29 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 25 Jan 2027 (81 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- DYNADOT LLC
Subdomain
www.cakecamp.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | cakecamp.com | 300 | 3.33.224.147 |
| AAAA | cakecamp.com | 300 | 2600:9000:a413:2068:7cac:af4e:cf97:8818 |
| MX | cakecamp.com | 300 | 1 mx1.emailsrvr.com |
| MX | cakecamp.com | 300 | 5 mx2.emailsrvr.com |
| NS | cakecamp.com | 300 | ns2.aftermarket.com |
| NS | cakecamp.com | 300 | ns1.aftermarket.com |
| SOA | cakecamp.com | 3600 | ns1.aftermarket.com. support.aftermarket.com. 2026110501 14400 3600 604800 300 |
| TXT | cakecamp.com | 300 | aftermarket-verification=cUdGUQ== |
| TXT | cakecamp.com | 300 | v=spf1 include:emailsrvr.com ~all 1more record(s) |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Configuration error
The SPF record contains invalid syntax.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.