bvf.de
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #94,820
▲ 755
- Rank in TLD
- #3,764
▲ 177
- Referring Domains
- 537
▲ 14
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.5
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.7
- Referring Domains
- 537
- Linked Domains
- 344
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 105
10–19 193
20–29 99
30–39 51
40–49 45
50–59 24
60–69 13
70–79 4
80–89 2
90–100 1
Total 537
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| bund.de | 85.4 | #144 |
| bayern.de | 77.4 | #793 |
| sueddeutsche.de | 74.5 | #1,411 |
| rlp.de | 71.9 | #2,389 |
| baden-wuerttemberg.de | 71.1 | #2,779 |
| aok.de | 67.1 | #5,437 |
| bremen.de | 67.0 | #5,559 |
| chatgpt.site | 66.6 | #5,839 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 3 Sept 2025
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
aktuell.bvf.dematomo.bvf.depm.bvf.dewww.bvf.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | bvf.de | 600 | 195.30.108.82 |
| MX | bvf.de | 600 | 20 mail.bvf.de |
| MX | bvf.de | 600 | 50 mail2.bvf.de |
| NS | bvf.de | 600 | ns01.14v.de |
| NS | bvf.de | 600 | ns02.14v.de |
| NS | bvf.de | 600 | ns03.14v.de |
| SOA | bvf.de | 600 | ns01.14v.de. hostmaster.one4vision.de. 2025141109 7200 3600 1209600 600 |
| TXT | bvf.de | 600 | v=spf1 mx ip4:212.82.33.143 ip6:2a04:6c0:1c:1::1 a include:spf.crsend.com ~all |
| TXT | bvf.de | 600 | swisssign-check=drj1063qt5tjjXr6h1oWFsmzzz0 |
| TXT | bvf.de | 600 | _7c7yk8kfwe5af7007z70bzh3yj5joy6 |
| TXT | bvf.de | 600 | swisssign-check=Pmz_LEYnXZX1Kqw82OcemKm0kNw |
| TXT | bvf.de | 600 | MS=DA22C1A637C9E97DBDB946F389504F49DF05FA0A |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.