buildanapi.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #3,681,723
▲ 807,202
- Rank in TLD
- #1,544,557
▲ 338,997
- Referring Domains
- 9
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 41.5
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 7 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 41.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.5
- Referring Domains
- 9
- Linked Domains
- 13
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 2
20–29 3
30–39 1
40–49 0
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 9
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| dev.to | 77.3 | #807 |
| raindrop.page | 50.4 | #89,874 |
| trackawesomelist.com | 38.9 | #561,354 |
| geekai.co | 25.5 | #4,391,771 |
| facts.dev | 24.5 | #5,097,452 |
| vrtrainer.dk | 23.7 | #5,694,596 |
| context-awesome.com | 19.9 | #9,860,877 |
| wackystudio.com | 19.3 | #10,919,218 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 6 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Dec 2025
- Expires
- 6 Dec 2026 (31 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- TUCOWS.COM, CO.
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | buildanapi.com | 120 | 18.208.88.157 |
| A | buildanapi.com | 120 | 98.84.224.111 |
| NS | buildanapi.com | 3600 | dns1.p01.nsone.net |
| NS | buildanapi.com | 3600 | dns2.p01.nsone.net |
| NS | buildanapi.com | 3600 | dns3.p01.nsone.net |
| NS | buildanapi.com | 3600 | dns4.p01.nsone.net |
| SOA | buildanapi.com | 3600 | dns1.p01.nsone.net. domains+netlify.netlify.com. 1661089962 43200 7200 1209600 3600 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.