brita.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #245,521
▼ 101,581
- Rank in TLD
- #10,520
▼ 4,261
- Referring Domains
- 370
▼ 11
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.7
- Subdomains
- 9
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 23.2
- Referring Domains
- 370
- Linked Domains
- 84
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 46
10–19 103
20–29 99
30–39 72
40–49 31
50–59 13
60–69 4
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 370
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| apple.com | 93.5 | #22 |
| bundestag.de | 73.6 | #1,683 |
| shopware.com | 69.1 | #4,005 |
| uni-hannover.de | 68.0 | #4,733 |
| netzpolitik.org | 66.1 | #6,384 |
| dhbw.de | 60.2 | #16,824 |
| archiveteam.org | 57.9 | #25,818 |
| gofeminin.de | 57.3 | #28,172 |
| heinze.de | 54.9 | #42,620 |
| pcon-solutions.com | 54.0 | #49,579 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2022
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
aliveasneverbefore.brita.deheimatwasser.brita.dewww.ionox.brita.dewww.kunstpreis.brita.dewww.partner-onlineshop.brita.dewww.professional.brita.desw.brita.dewasserspender.brita.dewww.brita.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | brita.de | 300 | 52.166.70.58 |
| MX | brita.de | 3600 | 100 brita-de.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | brita.de | 86400 | udns1.cscdns.net |
| NS | brita.de | 86400 | udns2.cscdns.uk |
| SOA | brita.de | 86400 | udns1.cscdns.net. premiumdns.support.neustar. 2019102783 28800 7200 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | brita.de | 3600 | MS=ms32875329 |
| TXT | brita.de | 3600 | facebook-domain-verification=chb8xeq9pnnh2nqgg201krqe3wxtrm |
| TXT | brita.de | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:84.201.65.44 -all |
| TXT | brita.de | 3600 | google-site-verification=jwCIMilHpeZkOVKvxL9DiYa_K8jVX48ka5vi1BBuWc8 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.