brafa.art
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #69,666
▲ 11,935
- Rank in TLD
- #18
▲ 3
- Referring Domains
- 420
▲ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.4
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 10 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.8
- Referring Domains
- 420
- Linked Domains
- 403
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 32
10–19 100
20–29 134
30–39 77
40–49 48
50–59 16
60–69 10
70–79 2
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 420
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| godaddy.com | 94.7 | #13 |
| corriere.it | 72.2 | #2,240 |
| domainnamewire.com | 71.0 | #2,794 |
| hosteurope.de | 68.2 | #4,603 |
| canalblog.com | 67.4 | #5,232 |
| christies.com | 66.0 | #6,427 |
| wallpaper.com | 65.4 | #7,016 |
| theartnewspaper.com | 64.6 | #7,937 |
| unil.ch | 64.3 | #8,293 |
| tass.com | 63.4 | #9,667 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .art
- Registration date
- 18 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2024
- Expires
- 18 Oct 2030 (1,443 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- UK Creative Ideas Limited
- Registrar
- Eurodns S.A.
Subdomain
httpswww.brafa.artimages.brafa.artwww.brafa.art
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | brafa.art | 600 | 104.46.60.163 |
| NS | brafa.art | 86400 | ns1.eurodns.com |
| NS | brafa.art | 86400 | ns2.eurodns.com |
| NS | brafa.art | 86400 | ns3.eurodns.com |
| NS | brafa.art | 86400 | ns4.eurodns.com |
| SOA | brafa.art | 86400 | ns1.eurodns.com. hostmaster.eurodns.com. 2025080700 43200 7200 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | brafa.art | 3600 | cg298rrptu556jh573st419ec3 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.